For me, the mid to latter stages with a single baby is about perfect for me. I think twins are fine too, but it really depends on the lady carrying them in those cases. Probably the taller the lady, the better in that case.

More than twins...? That's when it's going too far for my own personal tastes (unless it's only about mid-way into the pregnancy).

Twins is about perfect for me. Preferably small petite girls carrying really healthy twins.

It depends, sometimes size of preggo belly with one is bigger than twins so... my perfect one is the size like pierce jayme has

I'm not sure if he means how many babies a woman can have at one time of number of pregnancies in general. Probably the latter so according to a piece I came across during a google search, there was a woman who was pregnant with her 20th child! The piece went on to say that the more pregnancies a woman has, the more the risk of something bad happening increases. Here is a excerpt from the story:

"A woman's uterus, the organ within which the fetus develops, is a muscle, and each successive pregnancy stretches that muscle. As a result, after a woman has had many pregnancies, the muscle has a hard time contracting after the placenta----the organ that connects the fetus too the mother's blood supply ---separates. This creates a risk of massive bleeding. Because the uterus has been weakened by successive pregnancies, drugs to cause this contraction are typically less successful."

So basically like most people that have commented on this thread have said, it depends on how much punishment each individual woman's uterus can take before it is completely worn out. It's difficult to put an exact number that would be "too much pregnant", however I would say by the 10th pregnancy, the woman is already at risk of having major medical complications to herself, and the baby if she chooses to continue having children.

I love the idea of a woman continually getting pregnant but in reality it is dangerous and life threatening.

Yeah, myself I only want two kids. Maybe three, tops. One of the more annoying things about this fetish.

In the mother Nature there is not such a thing as having too many babies and females of all the other species are naturally trying to have as many as possible. Yes, we humans are a little bit further in this, but still it is a relatively "new" experience for us that less may actually be more and we are still adapting to that. Technically,... the bigger the level of particular country development, the less the child mortality and the smaller the part of their productive age women HAVE to spend pregnant (if the society does not want to die-off). There were times when being continually pregnant (and yes eventually even die during this process) was considered absolutely normal thing for an adult woman even in what we now call developed countries.

I mean...my grandmother had 16 kids (including 5 sets of twins) so I'm pretty sure she was sick and tired of being pregnant by the time she had her 16th child. Also, some of the babies died shortly after birth (keep in mind that this was during the 1950s).

But to answer your question, yes, I do think you can get pregnant too many times. I'm no OB/GYN or anything, but I just think it puts such a strain on a woman's uterus that it could pose a serious threat later in life. For example, my grandmother died of cancer at the age of 90. Could it be related to her having so many kids? Hard to say. All I'm saying is that having that many kids in such a short amount of time is not healthy at all.

(December 8, 2017, 5:44 pm)bballconnor But to answer your question, yes, I do think you can get pregnant too many times. I'm no OB/GYN or anything, but I just think it puts such a strain on a woman's uterus that it could pose a serious threat later in life. For example, my grandmother died of cancer at the age of 90. Could it be related to her having so many kids? Hard to say. All I'm saying is that having that many kids in such a short amount of time is not healthy at all.

Getting to 90 is pretty amazing for anyone, uber-uterus or not.

(December 4, 2017, 10:20 am)motofoko In the mother Nature there is not such a thing as having too many babies and females of all the other species are naturally trying to have as many as possible. Yes, we humans are a little bit further in this, but still it is a relatively "new" experience for us that less may actually be more and we are still adapting to that. Technically,... the bigger the level of particular country development, the less the child mortality and the smaller the part of their productive age women HAVE to spend pregnant (if the society does not want to die-off). There were times when being continually pregnant (and yes eventually even die during this process) was considered absolutely normal thing for an adult woman even in what we now call developed countries.

even though i have a huge desire for pregnant women, i actually feel sorry for them especially for women back in the days and those in third world countries and what makes it alot worse is their age.