She seems young and motivated to share more of herself later, and that could mean future pregnancies. She popped back in September of last year I think, so I don’t want to damage her chances. I mean, more pregnant content down the line seems exciting. I love models who share multiple pregnancies. I wouldn’t want to dissuade her from doing so by freely handing out her content, even when it’s a beneficial trade. Whoever gets her content can basically do whatever they like with it, but I just have principles and would love to see more of her if she plans on getting pregnant again.

(January 13, 2020, 12:18 pm)Avarics It’s not intended as gloating. In all seriousness, it is meant to promote the model. Sorry. I’m not going to leak content to people. This is why this site is infamous. People just giving out content for free while giving no incentive to the models to make more. We’ve had so many debates about this issue, and I believed I was being straightforward.

(January 13, 2020, 12:41 pm)coolkidzzz yes fair point, if the content is a couple years old , only then i think it's proper to ask around, but this has only been out for what? few months? she still can make $ out of this , the traffic is still high, so it's just common sense, if you can't support the model then don't demand too much. thank you avarics.

Ironic how preserving the site’s reputation is talked about when content barely a year old is released free throughout the threads.
“Promote” and “support”, yet someone released her content (all 11 clips and more) publicly not too long ago in November. And she was many of the models who’s clips was shared on this site despite being months old. It is confusing to me. Did a change of heart or morals suddenly took place? Should content someone else paid for be given for free? Absolutely not. It’s why I offer trades.

@"Avarics" if you were seriously going to promote and show your support, you shouldn’t say, “I bought her package for all of her vids. $50 is really a steal to me!” “so glad I snagged it before it runs out.” Your words comes out in a different tone and misinterpreted from your original intentions.
Instead you could’ve said, “Charlotte is selling a bundle that contains all of her clips + photos for $50. Compared To a possible total purchase of $300, you’re getting a discount over 80% purchasing her bundle. No offense.
I still offered because I wanted to put an effort rather than being discouraged.

We can debate about connotations and word usage all day, but I did not know that someone had leaked her content before. I just don’t want to do it myself and promote a common problem. I apologize for the misunderstanding, but mentioning that it is a good deal and still gives her more support than just getting a link from someone. I honestly first heard about her in this request thread.

When I’m actually open for trades, I specify @Golden . But since she still makes content and popped last year, I didn’t want to take the risk of letting her content get leaks. I’m very cautious about trading, and I don’t want repeats of Adobo and other models hitting back at all of us here instead of those involved. It’s all they can do really, because it is hard to nail down the specific people who leak content.

Once again, I apologize for any animosity I communicated in my preceding posts. I have just had enough with all the freeloading lurkers and people who flood the forum with leaks of models that still use porn as a profession and source of income.

This model actually has made an appearance here to request the drives of her stuff being shared publicly to be removed so it makes some sense to say "I ain't sharing"

50 frogskins for all her stuff is a good deal to know about too

(January 13, 2020, 3:34 pm)Golden

(January 13, 2020, 12:18 pm)Avarics It’s not intended as gloating. In all seriousness, it is meant to promote the model. Sorry. I’m not going to leak content to people. This is why this site is infamous. People just giving out content for free while giving no incentive to the models to make more. We’ve had so many debates about this issue, and I believed I was being straightforward.

(January 13, 2020, 12:41 pm)coolkidzzz yes fair point, if the content is a couple years old , only then i think it's proper to ask around, but this has only been out for what? few months? she still can make $ out of this , the traffic is still high, so it's just common sense, if you can't support the model then don't demand too much. thank you avarics.

Ironic how preserving the site’s reputation is talked about when content barely a year old is released free throughout the threads.
“Promote” and “support”, yet someone released her content (all 11 clips and more) publicly not too long ago in November. And she was many of the models who’s clips was shared on this site despite being months old. It is confusing to me. Did a change of heart or morals suddenly took place? Should content someone else paid for be given for free? Absolutely not. It’s why I offer trades.

@"Avarics" if you were seriously going to promote and show your support, you shouldn’t say, “I bought her package for all of her vids. $50 is really a steal to me!” “so glad I snagged it before it runs out.” Your words comes out in a different tone and misinterpreted from your original intentions.
Instead you could’ve said, “Charlotte is selling a bundle that contains all of her clips + photos for $50. Compared To a possible total purchase of $300, you’re getting a discount over 80% purchasing her bundle. No offense.
I still offered because I wanted to put an effort rather than being discouraged.

when the model has personally requested for her paid content to be withdrawn from public, we have to respect that, you don't have to put a blanket on everyone who has a pregnant fetish as someone who thinks the/she can do as he pleases because having a fetish means he's a moral deviant anyways, so screw the models for trying to protect their paid content. we all have fetishes, but in this case you lack self control. grow up and stop throwing tantrums.

(January 13, 2020, 10:21 pm)coolkidzzz when the model has personally requested for her paid content to be withdrawn from public, we have to respect that, you don't have to put a blanket on everyone who has a pregnant fetish as someone who thinks the/she can do as he pleases because having a fetish means he's a moral deviant anyways, so screw the models for trying to protect their paid content. we all have fetishes, but in this case you lack self control. grow up and stop throwing tantrums.

I was questioning the sudden changes of the users here out of curiosity from past actions that were placed not too long ago, not labeling who’s a deviant pervert or a self-righteous moral hypocrite. Don’t get it twisted. I never said anything about how models were wrong in protecting their content nor did I say anything about “sharing” or giving for free, I’ve said the opposite in regards of the latter and that the former are well within their rights to protect what rightfully belongs by law.
It’s that nothing stopped users here from sharing/trading clips before, especially not by clip age (months or years). Then suddenly it’s been in place or instilled in some people in a short time span. I’m asking where did this come from? (Don’t answer this, it’s a rhetorical question.)

“Lack self-control.” “Grow up?” Enticing me to provocation won’t work and those choice of words isn’t going to further weigh your argument.
Did you even read my first sentence thoroughly before replying? If you think debates and controversial topics are “tantrums”, then you seriously need to re-think your approach. This topic was done and over hours ago. You’re just adding fuel for nothing other than to say something.

Maybe we just shouldn't bring up Msmilfcharlotte anymore.

(January 14, 2020, 12:08 am)tomostrife Maybe we just shouldn't bring up Msmilfcharlotte anymore.

A lot of sites end up having to ban content and links from specific sites and subjects because things like this happen. When someone comes in personally to ask that it stop it's probably best to respect that before lawyers get involved.

It's up to admins here to determine if a ban list is warranted.