Sexually Charged Comments In Threads

[LTKNT101]

I only have a problem if it gets too weird. Like, one time, someone here (not naming names) posted a graphic description of a teenage girl giving birth in response to a picture someone had posted. That, to me, is a bit too much.

The way I see it, it's a pregnancy fetish forum. This site is inherently sexual, so it's not unreasonable to expect some sexually charged comments on here. Has there been a problem with sexual comments on this site? Am I out of the loop?

This is the best comment I've seen on this topic so far. Yes, unfortunately, there is a problem only because some guys in here don't like to read comments from other guys talking about doing sexual things to pregnant women. I still can't figure out why they get so triggered. We all want to fuck pregnant women so why should I get upset when a guy comments how much he wants to nail a hot preggo he saw out shopping? Getting offended makes no sense at all. Reading sexually charged comments are fun because you know you want to fuck these knocked up chicks just as much as the next guy does. It's no different than sitting in a strip club. You are around a bunch of horny guys making it obvious how much they want to nail the women on stage. One argument I've seen being passed around is quote "We know you are sitting at your computer with your dick in your hand, therefore, you don't have to tell us about it."

Knowing a preggophile is fapping off to pregnant women should not bother you especially when you are doing the same thing. Just saying.

[tomostrife]

This whole topic just seems like a thinly veiled roleplay fetish. You might find some luck finding others to RP with you. There seems to be a few threads here.

[harbles]

Unnf, the OP gets me so hard, I'm cumming all over him.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, OP, your very own horny guy post. Whiny, entitled, libertarian/alt-right incels that are incapable of self-reflection are my fetish. Tell us that there was no way I could have avoided posting it. Tell us what that added to the discussion. Tell us how you would meaningfully respond to it. Tell us that if you could choose to see it versus not see it, that you would prefer to see it.

LMAO!! I don't see how commenting about ejaculating on a man makes your point because it is not the same as commenting about ejaculating on a pregnant woman. Your comment would be more effective if this was Gayphilia. With that said I'm all for freedom of speech so if you are into dudes knock yourself out and comment from the heart. Just be aware you are perving on men in a forum about pregnant women. LMFAO

I should have thought that was obvious satire. You've now refused to engage with issues brought up in this post or the one previous, which is a hallmark of people who can't defend their position (and/or have an ulterior motive for their position that they've kept secret). I'll make it easier for you and summarize them as yes/no questions that you can also choose to elaborate on:

1. Is telling people they can't or shouldn't comment on other comments an attempt to restrict or limit speech? Yes or no?
2. Do you agree with my assessment that "horny guy" posts are effectively spam/advertising, that neither contribute to discussion nor can be meaningfully replied to? Yes or no?
3. Do you agree that posters who appear to have registered solely to spam/advertise should be prohibited from posting? Yes or no?
4. If you had to decide between seeing "horny guy" posts vs not seeing them, would you choose to see them? Yes or no?

e: I missed the responses on the new page. You do realize that strip clubs don't let patrons in the main area masturbate openly, right? They get thrown out and banned. There are closed booths for that. I agree with tom that it seems like you're really into horny guy posts.

e2: Whoops, I forgot a question. #5. Do you agree that horny guy posts don't just appear unbidden as soon as the poster thinks them, that they have to choose to post? Yes or no?

[harbles]

Well OP, you've had a full day to respond and you were normally so attentive to this thread before now (and you've been posting in other threads throughout the day), so I guess these questions were too hard for you. I'm pretty sure the correct answers were all "yes", though.

It's okay if guys talking dirty is one of your other fetishes, but as you said, we cater to the pregnancy fetish here. I hope you'll join the folks who try to encourage the dirty talkers to indulge their non-pregnancy fetishes in venues where they're more appreciated.

[LTKNT101]

Well OP, you've had a full day to respond and you were normally so attentive to this thread before now (and you've been posting in other threads throughout the day), so I guess these questions were too hard for you. I'm pretty sure the correct answers were all "yes", though.

It's okay if guys talking dirty is one of your other fetishes, but as you said, we cater to the pregnancy fetish here. I hope you'll join the folks who try to encourage the dirty talkers to indulge their non-pregnancy fetishes in venues where they're more appreciated.

We all know what spam is so there is no need for me to explain it to anyone here. If I see a hot pic of a pregnant girl and I say "Damn she's hot! I would so tear up that pussy!" that is not spam. Expressing how much I would like to bone her contributes to the purpose of this site. I hate repeating myself but for the purposes of this discussion, I will. This site is a place for preggophiles to perv on pregnant women. Sexually charged comments made about pregnant women are part of perving on pregnant women. Like it or no those are the facts.

As for your question and answer list, I will not take part in it as it is a distraction. often in a debate, one person will attempt to shift the focus by making the debate about the person they are debating with. This is not about me. It's about the freedom to make sexually charged comments about pregnant women in a forum that is 100% about perving on pregnant women. As soon as I responded to that list by giving yes or no answers the topic becomes about me. Skilled debaters can spot traps like these a mile away. As for the reference I made about strip clubs it seems you missed the point. Everyone in the strip club is there to perv on women just like we are all here to perv on pregnant women. Someone making a sexually charged comment directed toward a hot pic or video posted here is in no way disrupting the order or the purpose of this site.

[harbles]

But we're not talking about all sexually-charged comments. That was one of multiple equivocation fallacies made by you, as a self-declared skilled debater*, to try and lump "she's hot" comments together with the sort of comments we're actually talking about: fantasy roleplay talk where the poster is making the post about themselves and their imaginary actions. Are you capable of making a distinction between the two?

I was prepared to ignore your repeated use of underhanded debate tactics, since it didn't seem to me that you were a skilled debater. This isn't a forum that caters to that particular fantasy, so I'm quite prepared to disabuse you of it. Shall we dance?

Perhaps you could set aside the rhetoric and fallacious arguments and state your case in the form of a numbered syllogism? We'll also need to agree upon things like what to do if one of us breaks the rules of formal debate and how we determine who had the more effective arguments.

* Odd how you resort to debate tactics that are widely recognized as the sort that have to be used by people who can't support their arguments through conventional means, such as by being correct.

[LTKNT101]

I see what you did there and I do love your use of big words. Very intimidating indeed. Well played my friend. Well played.

Guys are not role-playing when they talk about how much they want to fuck or do things sexually to pregnant women. In order to role play, you must have someone else to play the opposite character. Both participating parties exchange dialogue based on the scenario they are acting out. I know what you meant but "roleplay" was not the best term to use for getting your point across. I will meet you halfway and agree that what they are expressing can be perceived as a fantasy in the form of a sexually charged comment. You dissected my previous reply by cutting the reference I made to only be "She's hot". This clever editing while well played is an attempt to twist my words to infer that I was talking about non-sexually charged comments. The reference I made was "Damn she's hot, I would so tear up that pussy!"  That is a sexually charged comment. That is what we are talking about.

Your attempt to put words in my mouth actually makes you look more like the one who is attempting to change the narrative of this discussion and include out of topic arguments. Unless you have something that is on topic and not an attempt to discredit me I will refrain from further correspondence because by engaging in a pointless back and forth between us we are actually distracting the focus of this thread. It's not about you and me going at it to see who can handle themselves in the arena of ideas. My final words will be on-topic.

We are here to perv on pregnant women and satisfy ourselves by looking at images of them. Talking dirty about them is part of perving on them therefore it is my opinion that aspect of perving should not be censored. If making sexually charged comments about pregnant women is how some guys have fun in here the fetish community should support that because at the end of the day we are all playing for team preggophile.

[harbles]

I don't think it follows that talking dirty is a necessary component of "perving" (this is a nebulous term, please provide a precise definition), because there are plenty of us who don't do it and there are those of us who don't like it. Yes or no?

I noticed that our discussion has appeared to inspire you to post in other threads that I've posted in, so perhaps I can more clearly express the distinction I'm trying to make from the instance that I've spotted. Do you think there's a difference between someone not expressing any specific fetish (ie - "damn she's hot, I would so tear up that pussy") and a fetish that isn't pregnancy, such as guro (ie - "damn she's hot, I would fuck her until her uterus burst and she died")?

My apologies if I made a self-declared skilled debater feel intimidated. It wasn't intentional; since you specifically rejected my attempt to make things simple for you, I thought you'd be okay with taking something a little bigger. Perhaps you could tell me what range of discussion would allow you to feel like you're in a safe space where you don't have to read anything you find troubling? And then, since the issue we're discussing specifically relates to that, why should I cater to your special needs?

[harbles]

This is the second time I've had to prod you to return to the discussion (which you started) after a wait of over 24 hours. I'll assume you've ceded the argument and won't be following this thread any further*; you can justify that to yourself however you wish.

* The only reason I spotted it in the first place was because you posted it in the wrong subforum.

[anotherunreg]

This is the second time I've had to prod you to return to the discussion (which you started) after a wait of over 24 hours. I'll assume you've ceded the argument and won't be following this thread any further*; you can justify that to yourself however you wish.

* The only reason I spotted it in the first place was because you posted it in the wrong subforum.

1. This isn't a job so knock of the "you have to be here and do X with me at Y time".
2. Stop huffing your farts, you're stinking up the whole thread with buttcrack.