(December 8, 2017, 9:59 am)Murble Can somebody PM who this is? I have no clue, and I'd like to perform, uh, research.

What he said. Ive got big plans this Sat so a simple PM will be good. Plus I like a lil drama since all thats on TV is Xmas stuff. (Dont worry Ill view whatever U send me in "incognito" mode so its not in my YT or FB account. I just wanna see a video for myself. I love when people go at it.

I have now seen the person/videos in question. I'm not going to give out the links and I will be vague about dates because she says she's being stalked in real life and I know how things go here sometimes.

Let's work with what we know for sure.

- She said she and her husband resumed sex about two weeks postpartum.
- Her first positive pregnancy test was 4 weeks and 3 days postpartum.

It takes at least 2-3 days after implantation for the body to produce enough HCG to register on a home pregnancy test. Let's assume a best-case scenario of 2 days. That gives us an implantation date of 4 weeks and 1 day postpartum.

It can take an average of 7-10 days for implantation to occur after ovulation. So again, we'll assume the best-case scenario of 7 days. That would put her ovulation date at 3 weeks and 1 day postpartum and less than a week after she resumed sex. Very improbable.

Now, she said she had her first ultrasound (which revealed 3 gestational sacs) at 5 weeks and 4 days postpartum, just 17 days after ovulation. It takes 18-21 days for a gestational sac to be visible on an ultrasound. It's possible my numbers above are off, but not by any more than about a week; she could not have ovulated before 13 days postpartum and still have gotten pregnant. If you assume that my numbers above could be off by a day or two, she got scanned about as early as you possibly can be.

She did show two photos of the ultrasound, but one photo only shows one sac and the other shows two. She is using her finger to cover up the part of the ultrasound that has her date of birth, but she's also covering up the part that shows the date of the ultrasound. The two photos are on the same piece of paper that is printed out of an ultrasound machine, so they must have come from the same ultrasound visit. However, it's possible those were from her previous twin pregnancy.

So, in summary, it turns out the story is possible, maybe even barely plausible, but highly, HIGHLY improbable. The necessary timing of the events leaves such little margin for error.

Jumping in here:. doubleintegral's assumptions check out. This is highly improbable, though not totally out of the realm of possibility. Just going to proffer a few thoughts knowing only how the "mama vlogosphere" works:

-Iis she maybe just not bright enough to know better? (Remember, she would be going A.M.A (against medical advice) in having sex sooner than 6 weeks postpartum. Even most reputable midwives suggest 4 - 6 weeks.

- Is she maybe playing to the camera the way JessFam seems to be doing? Gotta get that attention and those views. Hate having this mindset but not too far fetched. If she's got enough followers she's a content creator. A loss of one baby out of "three" could really boost views...

Still, on the off chance this ends up being the miracle of the year can someone please, please, please PM me with a link?

So update....she wasn't pregnant with triplets at all. Kinda wanna get that out of the way for closure.

Im confused. Im off so im not doing much work. I saw a comment she made saying 1 sack is ovum or something... an the other 2 might not be viable cus no hearbeats were found. We will Just have to wait a few weeks n see. We do know she got pregnant at 15.. i wonder how many kids she had at that age. The twins came this year.

Why would she keep all these kids. Most are lucky to have 1. Im all for pregs but I dont care if she ends up staying preg or not. If she does im not throwin a party (I hope she closes up shop) & if she miscarries.. ill drink a sip a scotch to dat. So.. thats about it.

Attention whore