|
morgans1991 (1693)
July 1, 2013, 4:16 pm
|
Posts: 504
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 1693
|
knockedup14 (162)
July 2, 2013, 1:18 am
|
Posts: 79
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 162
July 2, 2013, 1:18 am by knockedup14 (162)
I was just thinking today how much I like this too...
|
Belly Button (459)
July 2, 2013, 1:59 pm
|
Posts: 540
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 459
July 2, 2013, 1:59 pm by Belly Button (459)
I must admit that I’m not particularly a great fan of pierced navels. I prefer them ‘naked/natural’ personally. However, there is definitely something attractive about seeing one in situ during pregnancy. The sense of “stuff this, it’s staying in for as long as possible!”.
I could very well be wrong (and I’ll happily stand corrected on this) but isn’t the general advice to remove the piercing once the belly begins to start expanding? I think the reason behind this is fairly obvious - the expansion causes distortion to the piercing hole and could possibly tear the skin should a piercing be left in place.
I also know that ‘pregnancy’ piercings are available which keeps the piercing hole open and as distortion free as possible, for the possibility of one going back in afterwards. Perhaps these girls keep their piercings in not knowingly aware of this...?
|
morgans1991 (1693)
July 2, 2013, 2:16 pm
|
Posts: 504
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 1693
July 2, 2013, 2:16 pm by morgans1991 (1693)
I did come across this when I was checking it out for my stories, but certainly some of the girls seem to like leaving them in or just leave them in out of pure ignorance.
I also tend to prefer the navel to be naked/natural, but the occasional look of a pierced one, especially when late on and with a very tight belly certainly gets me going!