I tried finding the video, but it seems it was taken off YouTube: there was a skit on SNL where a young couple revealed to their family that they were like... 7 or 8 months pregnant with twins. The woman was skinny and didn't look pregnant. She turns around to show them her comically large ass: some how, the twins she's carrying are back there.

If wombs were not in the abdominal area (and ignoring all questions of how the babies would be born), if every pregnancy was in multiples of 2,where would you rather have the babies grow: boobs or ass?

Breasts were the first part of the female body I developed a fetish for when I discovered women. I’ve always loved breast expansion and just about anything you can think of happening to a woman’s breasts.

So for the purposes of this thread if I was to relocate pregnancy I would put it in the breasts. In fact, each breast would have a womb and egg delivery system. Since we are working with multiples of two here this works perfect.

I like birth, which is pretty similar to a bowel movement already, so I would go with butt pregnancy. That way birth could still be out of the hips (even if the anus is a different orifice) and pushing the babies out could still be like "the worst poop of your life," a metaphor I have always found super hot.

   

"Babies come out of butts" - a childhood joke on a grade school playground (the boys think it's cool and the girls feel powerful about that fact of life). I like breasts more than butts (above average size, not very huge though), but only the baby needs an uterus to grow and the vagina to be delivered. And breasts aren't a BIG preference I have for women, 2nd (and esp 3rd) trimester bellies (above-average size as well) seem to fascinate me and turn me on.