Open Discussion
Just throwing this out there...
  2 of 2
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
alexnj
I think people posting photos from other people facebook or tumblr sites to this site is creepy. Thats why I have no photos of my wife on here.
dodrade99
When did everybody get so judgemental on here?

I don't particularly like smoking pics, but I don't write on those threads to complain.

Enough people think finding pregnant girls sexy is creepy without us turning on each other.
rottentomatoes2003
(Edited)
(Edited)
(May 30, 2015, 4:42 pm)Pharaoh170 [quote='Pregolover100' pid='38125' dateline='1432870312']
Pharaoh, you're obviously not homosexual, you belong to a Pregnancy fetish forum. -.-" [\quote]

What if I'm into mpreg? I could well be bisexual, either way. I could also be a woman. But now I'm just pointing out the obvious.

Quote:And the reason I asked when you were last in a serious relationship was because any guy who's loved a girl or guy knows this: Its fucking horrifying to imagine them with someone else. And imagining some guy beating off to them isn't much better. I'm just saying, I wouldn't want some guy sneaking photos of the woman I love, so I don't take or beat off to candids. If the girl posts them online herself, fine, different story, she has to be aware of Rule 34. But taking photos yourself without permission just sounds skeezy to me. We can at least agree on that, can't we?

Until recently I wasn't very happy with the candids board on this site. In that sense, "skeezy" indeed.

However, I still think you're splitting hairs a bit. So you don't beat off to candids. Do you beat off to photos that people take from tumblr, for example, and repost here? There isn't that much of a difference. In all likelihood, these are some other guys' wives. (And, oh, by the way, in general it's considered bad form to take content from one site and put it on your own site without getting permission. In that sense, this is almost the same thing as physically taking candid photos.)

Why is it necessary to control who does or does not beat off to thoughts of your wife? Dude, let go.

Frankly, I think there's a significant difference between posting content from Facebook, tumblr, instagram and posting/taking candid photographs and posting them here.

While I will never post anything from my friends profile pages on here (that's a clear violation of trust), they were, at the end of the day, the instigating party and original source of the photos. They presumably know the risks of posting personal content on the internet. Again, they're not something I would share here, but anybody putting themselves on the internet, physically and emotionally, are subject to sources outside of their inner circle acquiring their content. It's a risk people are often fine taking.

Candids are different. There is no consent given from the party in question. There is no knowledge of risks by them. This is strictly somebody taking a picture of somebody in public for the purpose of whacking it, unbeknownst to the subject of the candid. Morally, I have a big issue with this. Not only do I see it as immoral (since people should have the luxury of a certain amount of privacy, even in a public setting), but it's a clear violation of trust amongst even strangers. It crosses the border of good taste.

There's plenty of things available on the internet that I can enjoy viewing. I don't and won't include candids in that category. It's wrong. I don't care if you disagree, and I don't think this is a "every person's opinion is valid" sort of situation. I have a problem when the paparazzi do it to celebrities (for the purpose of selling to gossip publications and sites), and I have a big issue when strangers do it to everyday people for sexual purposes.
Liked by TheFreak (Jun 3, 2015), Akhenaten (Jun 2, 2015), (Jun 1, 2015)
Akhenaten
(May 28, 2015, 11:31 pm)Pregolover100 Pharaoh, you're obviously not homosexual, you belong to a Pregnancy fetish forum. -.-"

Actually! You could be straight as a horseshoe and still think pregnancy is hot. Isn't human sexuality fascinating? Smile
untitled
So with all these fascinating responses...what is the point of having the candid section? I mean I post candids not in the sense of "Oh she's hot let me whack off to her". I only post them because of the amazing fascination I have for the pregnant body. It's amazing at what nature can do, and how not everyone is the same. So it's more of a "hey look at this, or look at that" I don't look at them in an objective way. When your sole intention is to just whack off to some picture someone took then you're objectifying the woman in the picture. I look at it more as a fascination. I mean I might go against my initial post in the future but just at the mere amazement I'll have if my own wife is pregnant (whenever that will be). I mean I know people will probably look at her and whack off to her, but that's my risk to take. I'll cross that bridge when I get to it.
johnnyverlander
You should have no reasonable expectation of privacy when going into public so the morality of candids is a moot point. As far as doing it, I have no interest in getting caught so I don't. But if I knew I could get away with it freely, I would do it all the time. My biggest reservation about others doing it is that if they do get caught, it makes all if us look bad. But if you think you can do it without getting caught, more power to you.

As for family and friends, I have no issue with it. No one knows about my pregnancy fetish so the chances of getting caught are slim. And if they did get around to the internet, well, that's how the internet works. Once you put it out there, it's out there.
preggopartyreturns.tumblr.com
ShotGlass
Hey all, I find this topic interesting so I thought I'd chime in. First of all, this is a debate that goes back as far as I can remember on various pregnancy forums - those totally against candids and those who love them - it seems there aren't a lot of people who fall into a grey area with this one . For me, I'm a BIG candid fan (both seeing others and taking my own), and always have been. When I see a pregnant woman, it's almost a drive for me to try and capture a candid, just like the pregnancy fetish itself is a drive. I don't mean to speak for everyone who takes candids and shares them on this site, but I think some of us have a voyeurism fetish in addition to the pregnancy fetish that brings us to this particular board. And I'm sure those of you who hate candids, have some "combo fetishes" as I like to call them - things your into besides just pregnancy, or in addition to pregnancy.

What I think is important to note, is that there are candid sites out there specifically dedicated to guys taking pictures and videos of women in public and sharing them with each other, just like we share all sorts of videos and pictures here (only a fraction of which are created by women who WANT us to beat off to them), so the argument against this particular section of our forum seems like a pretty small battle to wage. Basically my point is that pregnant or not, if your girlfriend is even mildly attractive, she has the chance of showing up on some random candid site where guys are worshipping any and all parts of her, just so you know. If you're that worried about her being photographed, then make it your job to be aware that it can happen anywhere and keep your eye out for potential photogs.

To wrap this up.... some of us that participate in candids on preggophilia may be members of those other candid sites - and, not that it matters - but a lot of the other members of those sites don't really like preggos, they'd rather look at boobs, butts, etc.. So to be honest, that fact that this site has a candid section is amazing and wonderful, because it allows those of us who enjoy both pregnancy and candids to share with each other. Here's my simplified viewpoint of this whole debate --- to echo what dodrade99 said about not liking smoking pics, if you don't like it, just don't click on that section or post. Even if you don't like something, it's still going to exist somewhere on the internet.
rottentomatoes2003
(Edited)
(Edited)
(June 3, 2015, 4:16 pm)johnnyverlander You should have no reasonable expectation of privacy when going into public so the morality of candids is a moot point. As far as doing it, I have no interest in getting caught so I don't. But if I knew I could get away with it freely, I would do it all the time. My biggest reservation about others doing it is that if they do get caught, it makes all if us look bad. But if you think you can do it without getting caught, more power to you.

As for family and friends, I have no issue with it. No one knows about my pregnancy fetish so the chances of getting caught are slim. And if they did get around to the internet, well, that's how the internet works. Once you put it out there, it's out there.

This is awful reasoning. Because they may not find it, it's ok? What an ass backwards way to operate. I hope nobody actually trusts you with anything, because you have admitted that you would sell them out to share jerking material with strangers.

Everybody is entitled to a certain degree of privacy. Just because people walk in public doesn't give others the right to photograph them and flag them as masterbatory material. This is not a moral gray area....this is immoral, plain and simple.
Liked by (Jun 4, 2015), alexnj (Jun 4, 2015)


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)