If that's the case, could you post the originals? Until I see those, I'm going to believe this is her.

It's kind of sad that morphing is common enough to where you have to be skeptical of posts like this...

She has pics of her pregnant and holding her daughter from her last pregnancy. This guy just can't believe our luck, I think.

(September 12, 2015, 11:51 am)wrathoflego Well for anyone interested here's the scope.

I check the *** page very frequently and I noticed the pattern of image posts and questioned the validity of the page itself. I started to question whether she was actually posting to *** page or is this someone else. I scoped around for more links of Julez throughout the internet. I found 2 sources that I will not disclose because personal profiles and when I looked extensively through those sources I found the same pictures posted. The difference was they weren't brilliantly edited with graphics and morphing like the ones on Imgur, they were the actually pictures.

So the pictures are actually of her most recent pregnancy (4th) which was a while ago, morphed into her "5th pregnancy with surrogate twin boys". If I burst everyones bubbles I apologize. When I found out I was really disappointed especially after spending 6 weeks constantly checking the page.

Even though they are morphs I still think there really good morphs and a good little fictional progression for one of the greatest preggos ever.

(September 12, 2015, 12:28 pm)PreggoFetish If that's the case, could you post the originals? Until I see those, I'm going to believe this is her.

Yep, there's no reason to make this claim while not posting the so-called originals. Let's see them. The pictures posted so far don't appear to be morphed (someone added a stain on a grey shirt?), but who knows, some people are exceptionally talented with Photoshop.

Here's a contrast/brightness-enhanced version. No distortion, no artifacts. I'd be surprised if this is a morph.

I'm on the same boat as phil. Skeptics being skeptics. You wanna call someone out, back it up. Otherwise I'm gonna keep being a giddy little fucker about this goddess. Can't wait to see the content.

(September 12, 2015, 5:27 pm)pregphil

(September 12, 2015, 11:51 am)wrathoflego Well for anyone interested here's the scope.

I check the *** page very frequently and I noticed the pattern of image posts and questioned the validity of the page itself. I started to question whether she was actually posting to *** page or is this someone else. I scoped around for more links of Julez throughout the internet. I found 2 sources that I will not disclose because personal profiles and when I looked extensively through those sources I found the same pictures posted. The difference was they weren't brilliantly edited with graphics and morphing like the ones on Imgur, they were the actually pictures.

So the pictures are actually of her most recent pregnancy (4th) which was a while ago, morphed into her "5th pregnancy with surrogate twin boys". If I burst everyones bubbles I apologize. When I found out I was really disappointed especially after spending 6 weeks constantly checking the page.

Even though they are morphs I still think there really good morphs and a good little fictional progression for one of the greatest preggos ever.

(September 12, 2015, 12:28 pm)PreggoFetish If that's the case, could you post the originals? Until I see those, I'm going to believe this is her.

Yep, there's no reason to make this claim while not posting the so-called originals. Let's see them. The pictures posted so far don't appear to be morphed (someone added a stain on a grey shirt?), but who knows, some people are exceptionally talented with Photoshop.

Here's a contrast/brightness-enhanced version. No distortion, no artifacts. I'd be surprised if this is a morph.

To shed some light into the matter let's first look at the "fakes".

(September 13, 2015, 3:51 pm)wrathoflego

(September 12, 2015, 5:27 pm)pregphil

(September 12, 2015, 11:51 am)wrathoflego Well for anyone interested here's the scope.

I check the *** page very frequently and I noticed the pattern of image posts and questioned the validity of the page itself. I started to question whether she was actually posting to *** page or is this someone else. I scoped around for more links of Julez throughout the internet. I found 2 sources that I will not disclose because personal profiles and when I looked extensively through those sources I found the same pictures posted. The difference was they weren't brilliantly edited with graphics and morphing like the ones on Imgur, they were the actually pictures.

So the pictures are actually of her most recent pregnancy (4th) which was a while ago, morphed into her "5th pregnancy with surrogate twin boys". If I burst everyones bubbles I apologize. When I found out I was really disappointed especially after spending 6 weeks constantly checking the page.

Even though they are morphs I still think there really good morphs and a good little fictional progression for one of the greatest preggos ever.

(September 12, 2015, 12:28 pm)PreggoFetish If that's the case, could you post the originals? Until I see those, I'm going to believe this is her.

Yep, there's no reason to make this claim while not posting the so-called originals. Let's see them. The pictures posted so far don't appear to be morphed (someone added a stain on a grey shirt?), but who knows, some people are exceptionally talented with Photoshop.

Here's a contrast/brightness-enhanced version. No distortion, no artifacts. I'd be surprised if this is a morph.

To shed some light into the matter let's first look at the "fakes".

And now let's compare to the images found from the real source. Note: the first image is of her at 34 weeks singleton and the original unedited pictures showing her real belly, her 3 kids and no baby girl yet.

Well, there's the proof. Bummer!

Damn, I stand corrected. Thanks for straightening this out wrathoflego.

Holy tamales. I ain't even mad. That's one sexy woman regardless. Thanks for shining the light.