(January 24, 2016, 6:13 am)Paradox

(January 24, 2016, 5:37 am)mustamulta To me morality is religions' one attempt to artificially control people. That is what holds people against maiesiophilia-minded.

You're actually not so far off with that one.
Porn was quite famous during the time of the roman empire. After the christian Religion came to power it said "SHAME" and kind of forbid much stuff related to sexual material. (Destroying statues with nude men by removing the genital area/covering it. Scrapping off old paintings, etc...).
Same thing with Islam and several other religions.
The believe that free expression of sexuality is a sin is/was common spread and therefor has an heavy impact on the definition of "Morals" in a society.

Yes. And early popes wanted to chain and control kings and tribe leaders with christianity. That's why they banned polygamy, praised celibacy and poverty (promises) etc. The more I read history of christianity, the more I dislike it in what way popes and other leaders used it and corrupted.

I don't see pregnant women making sexually explicit content and others enjoying that content as morally wrong. That being said, I'd be shocked if my mom did pregnant porn.

A better question to ask is if using non-porn materials involving pregnant women for sexual gratification is immoral.

(January 24, 2016, 3:30 pm)Tricksterg If preggo porn is the same as "normal" porn, how would you consider birth porn to be? Still as normal? I'm having a bit of headache with that one.

As far as i know ( which is little) there are few real birth porns , it is just acting . By real i mean live action i am well aware of writing works of it
i dont think it is morally wrong to enjoy a work of fiction others am think so
now preggo porn as a whole :anything can be consider sexual the best example the foot fetish ( Warning i am talking out my ass) a foot is a simple thing that literally everyone has but because one group finds this hot is that wrong
To me no since it is people opinion of what moral is
sorry i wasted yalls time

(January 27, 2016, 2:17 pm)Tricksterg

(January 27, 2016, 11:28 am)Jimmy84 If the actors are ok with making it, I see nothing wrong with it

I don't really get this kind of argument. Most pregnant pornos end with a belly cumshot (which i love), still for me it feels like the mother makes a decision in place for the baby to take a cumshot.

not really there is fakes solos births jobs . the jobs as well standard yes end with jizz but not most and to be fair the mother is is getting paid to a job is it weird yes can it backfire later on yes if it is morally not then so many sites and studios over would be ...i dont know what u would do a large group destroy?
them make them illegal?