Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

(August 28, 2023, 6:13 pm)BiBeBel

(August 27, 2023, 4:09 pm)Azmarith I think OP is trying to ask if a pregnant individual has discovered herself on this website, and become upset.

(August 27, 2023, 7:36 pm)ILovePregnantsV2

(August 27, 2023, 4:09 pm)Azmarith I think OP is trying to ask if a pregnant individual has discovered herself on this website, and become upset.

Oh right, well there are in fact lots of articles in the mainstream media about pregnant women who have discovered that their photographs are on this website and have been upset about it.

I saw only one news about them

There's a few more articles out there.

(August 28, 2023, 7:35 pm)BeeHive Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

Dunno how anyone would have a lead back to the person.

(August 28, 2023, 6:20 pm)LTKNT101

(August 28, 2023, 6:16 pm)BiBeBel oooh I heard about dailymail, although this media is not represented in our country, what is wrong with them?

Dailymail is pro right/conservative. They are basically the conservative version of MSNBC.

They're trash.

(August 28, 2023, 7:35 pm)BeeHive Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

No, that was someone (who shall remain unnamed) who was informed that her Facebook photographs had been republished here. She discovered it because the person republishing those photographs, for reasons we still don't understand, decided to tell her -- he will also remain unnamed.

To the extent that it happens, it almost always involves someone serving as a white knight and essentially tattling. I don't think we've ever had an issue with candids and I doubt we ever will.

This is the British version of "The View" and, in hindsight, it's a bit funny (timestamp 4:45) -- it definitely wasn't funny when it happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfE9FjCIgq4

(August 28, 2023, 8:25 pm)Admin

(August 28, 2023, 7:35 pm)BeeHive Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

No, that was someone (who shall remain unnamed) who was informed that her Facebook photographs had been republished here. She discovered it because the person republishing those photographs, for reasons we still don't understand, decided to tell her -- he will also remain unnamed.

To the extent that it happens, it almost always involves someone serving as a white knight and essentially tattling. I don't think we've ever had an issue with candids and I doubt we ever will.

This is the British version of "The View" and, in hindsight, it's a bit funny (timestamp 4:45) -- it definitely wasn't funny when it happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfE9FjCIgq4

Let me get this straight, the person who republished her Facebook photographs here told her her Facebook photographs had been republished here?

(August 28, 2023, 9:15 pm)ILovePregnantsV2

(August 28, 2023, 8:25 pm)Admin

(August 28, 2023, 7:35 pm)BeeHive Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

No, that was someone (who shall remain unnamed) who was informed that her Facebook photographs had been republished here. She discovered it because the person republishing those photographs, for reasons we still don't understand, decided to tell her -- he will also remain unnamed.

To the extent that it happens, it almost always involves someone serving as a white knight and essentially tattling. I don't think we've ever had an issue with candids and I doubt we ever will.

This is the British version of "The View" and, in hindsight, it's a bit funny (timestamp 4:45) -- it definitely wasn't funny when it happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfE9FjCIgq4

Let me get this straight, the person who republished her Facebook photographs here told her her Facebook photographs had been republished here?

That is correct. If memory serves, I believe he managed to weasel his way into a members-only group for expecting mothers. When he was discovered, he reacted by "boasting" about republishing pictures here as a final act of spite -- needless to say, this isn't something we appreciated.

In general, we haven't had too many issues like this. The incident above is one of the handful of reasons we don't allow profiles/names to be shared -- we don't want thirsty individuals swarming profiles and/or scaring women into disabling their profiles. "Look but don't touch" is a concept a large percentage either cannot comprehend or, more likely, refuse to observe.

(August 28, 2023, 9:36 pm)Admin

(August 28, 2023, 9:15 pm)ILovePregnantsV2

(August 28, 2023, 8:25 pm)Admin

(August 28, 2023, 7:35 pm)BeeHive Wasn’t there a person on here who’s candids got lead back to them and they had to take them down or something?. I worry about that sometimes

No, that was someone (who shall remain unnamed) who was informed that her Facebook photographs had been republished here. She discovered it because the person republishing those photographs, for reasons we still don't understand, decided to tell her -- he will also remain unnamed.

To the extent that it happens, it almost always involves someone serving as a white knight and essentially tattling. I don't think we've ever had an issue with candids and I doubt we ever will.

This is the British version of "The View" and, in hindsight, it's a bit funny (timestamp 4:45) -- it definitely wasn't funny when it happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfE9FjCIgq4

Let me get this straight, the person who republished her Facebook photographs here told her her Facebook photographs had been republished here?

That is correct. If memory serves, I believe he managed to weasel his way into a members-only group for expecting mothers. When he was discovered, he reacted by "boasting" about republishing pictures here as a final act of spite -- needless to say, this isn't something we appreciated.

In general, we haven't had too many issues like this. The incident above is one of the handful of reasons we don't allow profiles/names to be shared -- we don't want thirsty individuals swarming profiles and/or scaring women into disabling their profiles. "Look but don't touch" is a concept a large percentage either cannot comprehend or, more likely, refuse to observe.

They're most likely the kinds of people that doesn't understand that pregnant women are not the objects that they expected to not react and fight back when push comes to shove; they also have little, if any manners at all when interacting with such people. 

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it would be funny if somehow a contingent of trolls from sites like 4 C h a n are acting as sleeper agents and are messing with the community here by painting us in a bad light. A bit sad if that's proven to be correct, but what can you do? A troll's gotta troll.

(August 28, 2023, 10:35 pm)auraman9005 They're most likely the kinds of people that doesn't understand that pregnant women are not the objects that they expected to not react and fight back when push comes to shove; they also have little, if any manners at all when interacting with such people. 

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it would be funny if somehow a contingent of trolls from sites like 4 C h a n are acting as sleeper agents and are messing with the community here by painting us in a bad light. A bit sad if that's proven to be correct, but what can you do? A troll's gotta troll.

Oh please, theres no shadow league of incels going around pretending to be preggophiles being rude and disrespectful to tarnish our fetish's social image. We did that all by ourselves. Hell if you look in most of these threads, it's everywhere. Theres a thread about a instagram girl where a guy admitted to boldly asking for more risqué stuff and when she blocked him, he made another account and hounded her again, *admittedly*. That's unhinged behavior. There's dozens of posts explaining why the rules are there and an equal number of posts explaining how it doesn't permeate their solid bone skull.

(August 28, 2023, 11:10 pm)tomostrife

(August 28, 2023, 10:35 pm)auraman9005 They're most likely the kinds of people that doesn't understand that pregnant women are not the objects that they expected to not react and fight back when push comes to shove; they also have little, if any manners at all when interacting with such people. 

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it would be funny if somehow a contingent of trolls from sites like 4 C h a n are acting as sleeper agents and are messing with the community here by painting us in a bad light. A bit sad if that's proven to be correct, but what can you do? A troll's gotta troll.

Oh please, theres no shadow league of incels going around pretending to be preggophiles being rude and disrespectful to tarnish our fetish's social image. We did that all by ourselves. Hell if you look in most of these threads, it's everywhere. Theres a thread about a instagram girl where a guy admitted to boldly asking for more risqué stuff and we she blocked him, he made another account and hounded her again, *admittedly*. That's unhinged behavior. There's dozens of posts explaining why the rules are there and an equal number of posts explaining how it doesn't permeate their solid bone skull.

Its not about "fighting back" its about not making a issue in the first place. Look, but don't touch. Not; try your luck cause she seems like a slut, double down when she says no, and create new accounts to harass her while simultaneously posting her content on your sExyPrEgGoLaDiEs TikTok page.

This fetish is larger than I think any of us comprehend. I watched it go from an obscure unknown fetish with a Geocities webpage to now basically multiple platforms on every piece of social media.

I'm aware of that, hence the key term "conspiracy theory", it's more of a hypothetical exercise than an actual possibility, since being here have had me see all sorts of degenerate behavior, from tolerated ones to more belligerent means. A fun way to see things, in a sense.

As for making it an issue in the first place, there's always an old adage in the admiration of preggos: never milk the cow too much lest the cow kicks you. Some people just don't get that memo sometimes and as a result, we all don't get some of that delicious milk.